Reluctant Buddha

Joined

• started 6 topics
• posted 33 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Reluctant Buddha

• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Spectrum, I care not for the sly subtly of the ID chuckawallas. Its all creationism to me.
  
  THERE IS NO GOD!
  
  Show me a god and i will believe in it. I have never seen a god and neither have you or anyone else. No god has ever conversed with you, or me, or anyone else.
  
  Reluctantly,
  Buddha
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Room 215, you are quite humorless.
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  SNG, my apologies, but alas I am only one of three Buddhas now using this screen name. Hopefully our numbers will increase.
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  FAITHFUL DOUBTER you're describing theistic evolution. Thats a huge step up from the creationist clowns, but God is still not a subject of science. I do not understand what is so difficult to comprehend about this.
  
  Science is empirical, dealing with objects that can be measured and weighed, etc. Science is also falsifiable. In other words, truly scientific ideas can be proven to be false.

  Not so with God. God cannot be placed in a laboratory and tested and weighed, etc.
  
  The idea of a God, even one that uses evolution, is not a falsifiable proposition. It cannot shown to be false. This is not a strength for the argument. I can claim that the entire universe was created by the Invisible Pink Unicorn yesterday morning at nine AM eastern standard time, with the appearance of great age and with all out false memories intact. This claim cannot be shown to be false, it is not falsifiable, hence is outside the realm of science and is within the realm of faith. You must choose whether or not to believe my claims about the IPU.
  
  The same with the "Goddidit" claim. What is so hard to understand? Even if you're correct and there is a God responsible for evolution, that God is still outside the realm of science.
  
  I will go to my grave scratching my head at the thickness and opacity of the godite skulls.
• 
  15

  HOW TO THINK LIKE A FUNDY

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  planning a career in online christian fundamentalist apologetics?

  how about the exciting world of young-earth creationism?

  witnessing to, and debating with, atheists and other hellbound unsaved sinners on the internet can be hard work, so you need to familiarise yourself with the tried and tested methods used by fundies all around the world.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Planning a career in online Christian fundamentalist apologetics? How about the exciting world of Young-Earth Creationism? Witnessing to, and debating with, atheists and other hellbound unsaved sinners on the internet can be hard work, so you need to familiarise yourself with the tried and tested methods used by fundies all around the world. After completing this simple training course, the shadow of doubt will never again flicker across your mind whilst listening to the lies and deceptions of those ignorant infidels who disagree with your self-evident truths. 1) Inerrancy First and foremost, the Bible is the absolute, literal word of God. Contrary to popular opinion, it contains none of the following: errors of any kind contradictions absurdities When you understand this, dealing with those who claim to have found a contradiction is simplicity itself: there are no contradictions, so he cannot have found one! You see? Easy, isn't it? If your opponent continues in his error after having this explained to him (nice and slowly), elaborate on your answer using an appropriate response from the following list: That translation is incorrect - in the original texts a different word is used, so it is not a contradiction. He is taking the verses out of context, so there is no contradiction. Satan has blinded him to the truth. There is no contradiction, and he should pray to be shown the correct meaning. This is only an apparent contradiction. That is not the same as an actual contradiction. If the verses are interpreted correctly, it is obvious that there is no contradiction. There are no contradictions in the Bible, so this is not a contradiction. The contradiction is caused by his anachronistic thinking. The word [insert word here] had a different meaning back then. Having just demonstrated that the supposed contradictions do not exist, you have now proved that there are no contradictions in the Bible, reinforcing your claim that it is truly the unsullied Holy Word of God. 2) Science There is but one measuring stick required to determine the truth of any claim - how it compares with Holy Scripture. More precisely, how it compares with your personal reading of Scripture. So, if some secular humanist scientists dare to dream up a theory (or "wild guess", as it is more accurately known) that apparently conflicts with the teachings of the Bible, clearly these egg-head mad professors have made yet another idiotic mistake, possibly under demonic influence. How do we know they are mistaken? See " 1 Inerrancy ". Conversely, when science agrees with the Bible we should applaud the brave, Bible-believing investigators for supporting the Holy Word and showing the glory of Creation. But usually they are wrong. Never forget, the atheists are quick to use the findings of science as "evidence" in their arguments, but this is because materialism and science are their god and religion. They want the men in white coats to save them from the God they know will judge them. There are many things which science cannot explain. However, you can explain these things instantly and simply by saying "God did it". Perhaps the atheist will say "Well, we don't yet know how the Big Bang happened, and maybe never will, but we're working on it". Easy solution - God did it. Problem solved. However, some atheists are stubborn in their evil ways and you may have to repeat this scientific explanation to them many times before they accept it. Of course, when scientists eventually do come up with an answers for such problems, be prepared to patiently explain to them that this is what your religion taught all along, if interpreted correctly. 3) Debating techniques Here we delve into the murky world of online debating with heathens. You can witness to lost souls in USENET newsgroups (such as alt.atheism and talk.origins), or in message fora on their websites. Self contradiction In a heated argument, you will often find yourself losing track of your previous posts, and the atheist will often accuse you of contradicting comments you made earlier. As your words are Bible-based, it stands to reason that they should therefore be correct at all times. Refer to " 1 Inerrancy ". Alternatively, remember that, as slaves of The Evil One, atheists will do their best to twist your words and attempt to confuse you. If this appears to be happening, ignore their comments and pray for strength. Logic and reason These are the playthings of the unbeliever, and you should have no truck with them. Faith in the Lord is all you need. The atheist will try to imply that God should be bound by the rules of logic, but God invented logic and so cannot be constrained by it! The more illogical and unreasoning you are, the harder it becomes for atheists to refute your statements. They will scream "But that doesn't make sense! It is logically impossible!" - be that as it may, your faith will tell you that you are correct. With God, all things are possible - including impossible things. What more do you need? The burden of proof is on the skeptic "Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" you will be told. But just who is making the extraordinary claim here? You, who simply observe the Creator's hand in all things, or the infidel who against all logic and reason denies the very same. Clearly, it is incumbent on the unbelievers to support their ludicrous assertions that there is no God. Ask them if they can prove God does not exist. Ask how they can be so arrogant to make this claim, when they have not searched the entire universe for God. They will come back and ask you to disprove the existence of Zeus, Vishnu and unicorns, but you should dismiss such childish nonsense - there is no comparison between the fairy-tale gods of other religions and the Truth of Christianity, Their inability to disprove God is evidence enough that He is real. If they cannot overturn your theory, they are clearly being unreasonable by refusing to accept it. Repeating yourself After spending a few days debating with a group of atheists, you should leave them alone for a week or so. This will give them time to come to terms with the truths you have revealed. Also, it will provide time for new people to join the discussion. This allows you to return to the forum once more and repeat your statements, unchanged, for the benefit of newcomers. We recommend storing your longer arguments in a text file, so it can be easily cut-and-pasted into the forum. If the forum regulars object, explain that, having already corrected their misconceptions, you are now simply trying to reach the new members and those who still unreasonably reject the truth. If they are civilised people, they will respect this and stand aside. Repeat this technique until you are banned from the board or placed in everybody's killfile. Huge posts To take the wind out of your opponent's sails, reply to the smallest query with pages and pages of text. Ideally, you should spend a couple of hours writing this yourself, but if you don't have the time cut-and-paste relevant (or, if possible, irrelevant) information from other Christian websites or resources. Try to spend at least ten kilobytes explaining why they should pray more, why they should fear Hell, how Christ died for their sins, why prominent Christian philosophers and scientists disagree with them, how long-dead Christians have already proven them wrong, and so on. Ask as many obscure questions as possible. If they are truly sincere (which, being atheists, is impossible) they will answer all of your points. If they fail to answer all of your points and questions, victory is yours. Make a note of this humiliating defeat and remember to bring it up often when dealing with this particular individual. (This is also a handy technique to use during a live debate with evolutionists. ) A variant on this theme is to post numerous verses from the Bible to support your argument. Why bother with a hundred words of explanation, when a single verse will do it all for you. Simply post the verse that refutes the atheist, and then maybe two or three more referring to hellfire. As the verses are known to be true, little more need be said on the matter. If the atheist predictably comes back with a counter argument, post the same verses again but suggest that he actually read them this time. Grammar and spelling - Are not important, as long as the Spirit guides you. If you are criticised for being unable to form a sentence in English, or using words like "athiset", "Noahs arc", "evolotin" and "revilatian" - worry not. It is not the trivia of punctuation and spelling which is important, but getting the message of God across. Consider this excellent example. To the untrained eye, the writer may appear to be an illiterate, ignorant dolt, but just feel the love in his words: "i was wonder if you yourself knew that darwin disowned his theroy in his last days knowing that fossils show species suddenly appering not sight mutations made over long periods of time. the fact is eveolution is total improvible." Only the coldest of hearts could not be moved by such testimony. This is the sort of level of incoherent drooling you should be aiming for. You should combine a flimsy grasp of the English language with your own distinctive writing style. The following are quite fashionable at the moment: writing everything in lower case without any punctuation at all this can be quite difficult to read but is very easy to type which is a bonus dont you think ALTERNATIVELY, WRITE EVERYTHING IN CAPS. THIS MAKES YOUR IMPORTANT MESSAGE STAND OUT AND PEOPLE WILL TAKE NOTICE OF IT AND REALISE THAT YOU REALLY MEAN IT. short, disjointed.....sentences separated by long......strings of dots.....this makes you look quite.....thoughtful as if you are......pausing every now and......then. Overuse of exclamation marks!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! can emphasise the point you are trying to make!!!!!!!!!!!! Question marks also work well, don't they??????????????????????????? Show ur mastery of the Internet by using words like "u" instead of "you", "2" instead of "to" and "too", "ur" instead of "your" and "you're", and u 2 can spread the gospel 2 other kewl d00dz. If English is not your first language, all the better. The way you present your argument says a lot about you, so pick wisely. Knowledge of the subject Whether you are talking about evolution, the origins of the universe, basic human anatomy, or the structure of the solar system, there is no need to concern yourself with learning anything at all about the issue. See "1 Inerrancy". By definition, those who disagree with you are wrong, deluded and possibly perverts, so it is a bad idea to pollute your mind with their religious beliefs. All the evidence in the world is no match for a single grain of the True Faith. If they say "But evolution doesn't work like that! You are completely clueless!" remind them that evolution doesn't actually work at all. Has a cow ever given birth to a dog? Do we see hydrogen turning into people around us? If we "evolved" from chimps, why are there still chimps? Why do we not see amoebae sprouting legs and talking? These harsh insights will cut through their dogma like a hot knife through butter. If discussing evolution, try asking for a complete list of transitional fossils from ape to human. They may provide you with a few dozen examples, but it is hardly complete, is it? How can you be expected to accept such shoddy evidence? Go on to inform them that those are not transitional fossils anyway, as there are no transitionals. Clearly God created all species individually, otherwise they would have no trouble finding the evidence. The gaps in the fossil record are therefore solid evidence for creationism. If they refer you to papers or websites showing that the universe is billions of years old, refer them in turn to Genesis. Explain how carbon dating methods have been shown to be hopelessly flawed. For instance, when the Turin Shroud was dated, the so-called experts put it around the 14th Century, instead of 33AD. This obviously calls into question all the other radiometric dating guesses they will throw around. Definitions of words Words can often mean several different things. For example, the word "set" has dozens of meanings : a set of things; a badger lives in a set; a jelly will set; you can set something down on a table; you can set up a meeting; and so on. Words mean what you need them to mean at any particular time. This is a common reason why you will find atheists misunderstanding things - they think you mean one thing, when actually you were talking about something else. It's hardly your fault if they are unable to keep up, is it? For example, Genesis speaks of a mist rising from the ground to water the Earth. This can mean : mist, rain, dew, fog, clouds, water vapour, condensation, snow, hail, sleet or any other conceivable form of precipitation. Let the Spirit guide you in this matter, and if the atheist claims you are mistaken or contradicting yourself, let the Spirit guide you once more to the true definition of the word. This may happen many times, as you can easily misinterpret the Spirit's guidance 4) Mental gymnastics Lying for Jesus Being economical with the truth, making up data on the spot and ignoring conflicting evidence are all handy weapons in your arsenal. The important thing is to convince the opponent of the veracity of your claims. Just how you go about this is unimportant. Feel free to refer to other fundamentalist works, whether or not they have been supposedly "discredited", "refuted" or "demonstrated to be false" - the ICR website and publications, Jack Chick tracts, Dr.Dino's website and videos, Answers In Genesis, things you remember hearing from other fundies or as a child in Sunday School, and so on. When comparing the works of God-fearing, Bible-believing Christians against deviant secular humanist scientists, who are you going to believe? Remember, you are here to save their immortal soul from the burning fires of Hell, not educate them in stuff they don't really need to know anyway. If you have a dubious argument based on fictional data, but it works, then there is no problem. The vital matter is bringing souls to Jesus and how you go about that is immaterial. The ends justify the means, and in this case the "ends" are souls being saved. Such a noble and worthy goal itself justifies any means you see fit to use. Physical force is generally frowned upon, although there are clear historical precedents for this. Use your own judgement. Don't forget, the Lord is watching at all times, and will certainly forgive you as long as you are spreading His good news. So go to it! Compartmentalisation In this world, what you know to be true often conflicts with the reality around you. To be a soldier for Christ it will help enormously if you can master the technique of mental compartmentalisation. This means you must be able to keep your scriptural knowledge away from the secular knowledge that allows you to function in wordly matters, e.g. at your place of work. For example, even though science is clearly mistaken about the processes involved in radioactive decay (see the "carbon dating" example above), if you worked at a nuclear power plant it would be necessary to assume the opposite was true - otherwise it would be impossible to build nuclear reactors. Likewise, a good fundy astronomer knows that the correct date of the universe is about 10,000 years at most, but must be able to examine galaxies millions of light-years away and explain them according to the secular model of cosmology. Being able to hold two (or more) sets of mutually exclusive thoughts at once is extremely beneficial to the up-and-coming fundy on the internet. Remember, something might be "true" while you're at work or sitting an exam, but it's still completely wrong, and you should switch back to the "Christian Compartment" in your brain whenever possible. Wilful ignorance Ignorance is bliss, and what is more blissful than reading the Word Of God? You will often find yourself accused of this "crime", but why should you waste time trying to learn how the unbelievers lie to themselves? You don't need to read a book on evolution to know that it is wrong. You don't need to read a book about the so-called Big Bang to know that it is a delusion. It is the atheists who are wildly ignorant for not reading the Bible! Sure, many of them say they have read it, but this is clearly a lie - if they've read it, how come they don't believe it? Don't waste your precious time trying to get to grips with their overly-complicated theories, when you have a much simpler theory that you already know is true. Conclusion There you have it - Fundy Think For Beginners. All you need to do now is decide how to sign off your devastating arguments. There is classic arrogant abuse, such as "Ha ha ha what an idiot! God made it all! Get an education."; or patronising the opponent - "I'll pray that God opens your closed mind and eyes"; a selection of obscure Bible verses, maybe; and finally, the ever popular subtle threats of hellfire - "Well, I've told you the Truth, I only hope you like it HOT after you die". Don't forget what you've learned : return a week later and post exactly the same assertions that you started with.
• 
  5

  Spoof of lyrics to tune of “Draggin' the Line”

  by AuldSoul in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  publishin' lies in the old hard way.

  takin' and takin' schmucks day by day.

  i go-out-in snow and rain and bright sunshine.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  VERY good! I like it! The new words smow floothly.
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  The god of the bible merely had to wave his magic wand and PRESTO-CHANGEO all of the dead and living tyranosaurus rex now possess fangs. If god did it with the living T Rex he did it with the dead T Rex too! Plus all other formerly cud-chewing animals that became carnivores! See how simple it all is when you factor godmagic into the equation?
  
  I am wondering though: Since ALL animals prior to the fall of man were vegetarians, why were only SOME animals changed into carnivores? Why not ALL? What was the deciding factor?
  
  Perhaps someone pissed on a wall and engendered the wrath of god?
  
  Reluctantly,
  Buddha
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Dear Tetrapod Sapien
  
  Many Buddhas shall be visiting here, hopefully, not just myself. Log-in names and passwords are a wonderful Xmas gift for sharing with the dozens of ones online friends. Hopefully, many will accept the invitation.
  
  Reluctantly,
  Buddha
• 
  69

  Gaps in Fossil Record Disprove Evolution? What about Gaps in Creationism?

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  missing links disprove a theory???.

  what about this one, creationists!!!.

  real t-rex .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  Missing Links Disprove a Theory??? What About THIS One, Creationists!!!
  	--vs--
  REAL T-Rex		Creationist T-Rex

  Creationists, aka the not-so-intelligent "Intelligent Design" advocates, claim that before the "fall of Adam" there was *no death and killing. Therefore, the T-Rex must have had cud-chewing flat cow-like teeth at the time, suitable for eating vegetables, rather than massive fangs, with are totally useless for eating grass and vegetables. That being the case, WHERE ARE THE FOSSILS WHICH SHOW THIS??? Where are the fossil T-Rex's with the flat grinding cud-chewing molars? If their theory is correct, there should be maybe 1,000 herbivore T-Rex remains to every carnivore, seeing how the T-Rex's wouldn't have become meat eaters until fairly recently, at "fall of Adam" about 6,000 years ago. That means there should be millions and millions of years prior to that where all the T-Rex's ate vegetables, and only a few years where they ate meat. So where are the remains, and in the proper ratio, that Creationism demands? Ohhh, they are MISSING, are they? Totally, completely, and utterly MISSING from the fossil record, are they? And you arrogantly MOCK evolution, claiming that ANY "gaps in the theory for which there is no evidence" disprove it? If that's so, then the lack of cow-like T-Rex's throws the ball right back into your court, you friggin' hypocrites. YOU made the assertion, now WHERE'S the evidence??? Thousands upon thousands of fossils have been dug up in the last 200 years, and not ONCE has a carnivore (T-Rex, Lion, Shark etc) been found with the kind of teeth your "Intelligent Design" theory demands. The FACTS show one thing, your FAITH demands another.
  
  
  * From the #1 Creationist organization in the world: Answers in Genesis} People and animals alike were given plants to eat in the beginning (Genesis 1:29–30). There was no meat-eating before the Fall, whether by man or by animal. The carnivorous part of the present ‘food chain’ did not exist. And God appropriately described His creation as ‘ very good ’ (Genesis 1:31).
  http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/faq/bad_things.asp
• 
  5

  PANDAS, PEOPLE, AND 'INTELLIGENT DESIGN"

  by Reluctant Buddha in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  of pandas and people by percival davis.

  56 of 66 people found the following review helpful:no actual science to be found here!, december 20, 2005. reviewer:"satan claws' (hell, michigan) note: i gave this book, of pandas and people by percival davis, one star because the amazon software does not allow me to give it no stars.

  as to "intelligent design" being taught in the classrooms of america, i have this good news: .

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Reluctant Buddha

  You're welcome to read creationist drabble. I spent several decades of my life reading that shee ite. Better things to do now.